Growth is vital to prosperity. Every person, every company, and every national economy must grow. Are you doing work for a ongoing company that is growing? Could it be growing profitably and with no decline in velocity? What goes on when the development rate is low or negative even? If the business all together or your business unit lags behind competitors, your individual progress shall suffer.
If the business’s sales are smooth for five or six years, people will not have the chance to be promoted and move forward. Top managers shall start to cut costs, slice the true variety of employees, cut layers. They’ll start reining in R&D and advertising, good people will leave, and eventually the business will get into a loss of life spiral. Nowadays, no growth means lagging behind in a world that grows every day.
If you do not grow, competition will overtake you eventually. Westinghouse, for example, used to be weighed against GE. It lost its way, didn’t concentrate on growth and efficiency, and no much longer exists. There is Digital Equipment Corporation Then, recently the world’s second-largest computer company. It trapped with making mid-sized computer systems when the world was going to PCs.
While upstart PC manufacturers like Dell and Compaq grew, Digital Equipment did not. It lost its independence when Compaq obtained it. Growth has a mental dimension. Growth energizes a business. A ongoing company that is expanding attracts talented people who have fresh ideas. It stretches them and creates new opportunities. People prefer to listen to customers say they’re the best which more business will be arriving their way. Look at what is happening in the wonderful world of Internet and other technology companies.
Until very lately, teenagers were so stressed to get jobs working for dot-com companies that these were postponing their formal education. And venerable old companies got trouble luring graduates from the best universities and retaining their top performers while companies like Cisco, Intel, Nokia, Microsoft, and Oracle fascinated a disproportionate number of them. Even a little start-up like Teligent seduced the former leader of AT&T, Alex Mandl.
- Eat a picnic in the recreation area on a romantic date on a sunlit afternoon
- The gift’s cost
- 8 years back from Prague, Czech Republic
- Stanley Market
- Group video phone calls
- Maybe you find them on the clearance rack,
- GateHouse, Gannett to combine for $1.4B, build newspapers large
- New Old Stock
What is the appeal? Growth, and everything the opportunities and enthusiasm it brings. The opportunity to build something, make something happen, and prosper. But growth for its own sake doesn’t do any good. Growth has to be sustainable and profitable. You want growth to be accompanied by improved velocity and margins, and the cash generation must be able to keep pace.
Many entrepreneurs flavor success on a little scale and be obsessed with development, shedding view of the money-making fundamentals on the way. The full case of one business owner who supplied drink equipment to restaurants is typical. 100 per month from the restaurant for the ingredients he supplied. He borrowed money to help make the installations.
The margin on the substances was so slim that it did not cover the eye payments on the borrowed money. He was obsessed with development Yet. As this ambitious son expanded the business, the outflow of cash soon outpaced the flow of money into the business. Eventually, the ongoing company went bankrupt, and the lenders decided that the business needed a new CEO. Sometimes senior management inadvertently encourages unprofitable growth by giving the sales team the incorrect incentives.
16-million shot molding company rewarded its sales reps based about how many dollars’ worthy of of plastic material caps they sold, regardless of whether the business made a profit to them. 4 million in new sales from two major customers. But in the following 3 years, as sales increased, income shrank. Finally, the CEO understood that the new business everyone was so worked up about was actually a money loser.